| Management proposals |
|
1a
|
Elect Director Jeffrey P. Bezos
|
For
|
For
|
|
1b
|
Elect Director Andrew R. Jassy
|
For
|
For
|
|
1c
|
Elect Director Keith B. Alexander
|
For
|
For
|
|
1d
|
Elect Director Edith W. Cooper
|
For
|
For
|
|
1e
|
Elect Director Jamie S. Gorelick
|
For
|
For
|
|
1f
|
Elect Director Daniel P. Huttenlocher
|
For
|
For
|
|
1g
|
Elect Director Andrew Y. Ng
|
For
|
For
|
|
1h
|
Elect Director Indra K. Nooyi
|
For
|
For
|
|
1i
|
Elect Director Jonathan J. Rubinstein
|
For
|
For
|
|
1j
|
Elect Director Brad D. Smith
|
For
|
For
|
|
1k
|
Elect Director Patricia Q. Stonesifer
|
For
|
For
|
|
1l
|
Elect Director Wendell P. Weeks
|
For
|
For
|
|
2
|
Ratify Ernst & Young LLP as Auditors
|
For
|
For
|
|
3
|
Advisory Vote to Ratify Named Executive Officers' Compensation
|
For
|
For
|
| Shareholder proposals |
|
4
|
Adopt Mandatory Policy Separating the Roles of CEO and Board Chair
Vote rationale:
The board should exercise objective judgement on corporate affairs and be able to make decisions independently of management. The roles of chairperson and CEO should not be held by the same individual. Where a company founder combines both roles, we may support this for a limited period, provided the board has put in place measures to mitigate any conflicts of interest.
Global Voting Guidelines
Deling av rollene som styreleder og administrerende direktør
|
Against
|
For
|
|
5
|
Report on Risks of Discrimination Against Ad Buyers and Sellers Based on Religious/Political Views
Vote rationale:
We will not support a shareholder proposal where the company does not appear to have significant gaps in their management or reporting of the relevant sustainability risk. We assess companies against our public expectations on environmental and social issues. We may consider direction of travel and pace of change as part of our assessments.
Global Voting Guidelines
Aksjonærforslag om bærekraft
|
Against
|
Against
|
|
6
|
Disclose All Material Scope 3 Emissions
Vote rationale:
The board should account for material sustainability risks facing the company, and the broader environmental and social consequences of its operations and products. Sustainability disclosures should be aligned with applicable global reporting standards and frameworks to support investors in their analysis of risks and opportunities. Where a company’s disclosure does not meet our needs as a financial investor, we will consider supporting a well-founded shareholder proposal calling for reasonable disclosure. We will not support a shareholder proposal that appears to impose a strategy or prescribe detailed methods, unrealistic timeframes or targets for implementation.
Global Voting Guidelines
Selskapers bærekraftrapportering
|
Against
|
For
|
|
7
|
Report on Impact of Data Centers on Climate Commitments
Vote rationale:
We will not support a shareholder proposal where the company does not appear to have significant gaps in their management or reporting of the relevant sustainability risk. We assess companies against our public expectations on environmental and social issues. We may consider direction of travel and pace of change as part of our assessments.
Global Voting Guidelines
Aksjonærforslag om bærekraft
|
Against
|
Against
|
|
8
|
Commission Third Party Assessment of Board Oversight of Human Rights Risks of AI
Vote rationale:
We will not support a shareholder proposal where the company does not appear to have significant gaps in their management or reporting of the relevant sustainability risk. We assess companies against our public expectations on environmental and social issues. We may consider direction of travel and pace of change as part of our assessments.
Global Voting Guidelines
Aksjonærforslag om bærekraft
|
Against
|
Against
|
|
9
|
Report on Efforts to Reduce Plastic Packaging
Vote rationale:
We will not support a shareholder proposal where the company does not appear to have significant gaps in their management or reporting of the relevant sustainability risk. We assess companies against our public expectations on environmental and social issues. We may consider direction of travel and pace of change as part of our assessments.
Global Voting Guidelines
Aksjonærforslag om bærekraft
|
Against
|
Against
|
|
10
|
Commission Independent Audit and Report on Warehouse Working Conditions
Vote rationale:
The board should account for material sustainability risks facing the company, and the broader environmental and social consequences of its operations and products. Sustainability disclosures should be aligned with applicable global reporting standards and frameworks to support investors in their analysis of risks and opportunities. Where a company’s disclosure does not meet our needs as a financial investor, we will consider supporting a well-founded shareholder proposal calling for reasonable disclosure. We will not support a shareholder proposal that appears to impose a strategy or prescribe detailed methods, unrealistic timeframes or targets for implementation.
Global Voting Guidelines
Selskapers bærekraftrapportering
|
Against
|
For
|
|
11
|
Report on Unethical Use of External Data in Development of AI Products
Vote rationale:
We will not support a shareholder proposal where the company does not appear to have significant gaps in their management or reporting of the relevant sustainability risk. We assess companies against our public expectations on environmental and social issues. We may consider direction of travel and pace of change as part of our assessments.
Global Voting Guidelines
Aksjonærforslag om bærekraft
|
Against
|
Against
|