Meta Platforms, Inc.

Ticker: META
Meeting date: 27/05/2026
Meeting type: Annual
Proposal Mgt rec Vote
Management proposals
1.1 Elect Director Peggy Alford For For
1.2 Elect Director Marc L. Andreessen For For
1.3 Elect Director John Arnold For For
1.4 Elect Director Patrick Collison For For
1.5 Elect Director John Elkann Vote rationale: Board members should devote sufficient time to fulfil their responsibilities effectively. The chairperson is responsible for leading all aspects of the board’s work and should devote a significant amount of time to fulfil his or her responsibilities effectively. Board members should contribute to effective discussions and decision-making by attending all meetings. Global Voting Guidelines Time commitment of board members For Withhold
1.6 Elect Director Andrew W. Houston For For
1.7 Elect Director Nancy Killefer For For
1.8 Elect Director Robert M. Kimmitt For For
1.9 Elect Director Charles Songhurst For For
1.10 Elect Director Dana White For For
1.11 Elect Director Tony Xu For For
1.12 Elect Director Mark Zuckerberg For For
2 Ratify Ernst & Young LLP as Auditors For For
Shareholder proposals
3 Report on Risks of Improper Use of External Data to Develop AI Products Vote rationale: We will not support a shareholder proposal where the company does not appear to have significant gaps in their management or reporting of the relevant sustainability risk. We assess companies against our public expectations on environmental and social issues. We may consider direction of travel and pace of change as part of our assessments. Global Voting Guidelines Shareholder proposals on sustainability Against Against
4 Initiate Annual Vote on Executive Compensation Against Against
5 Approve Recapitalization Plan for all Stock to Have One-vote per Share Vote rationale: All shareholders should have the right to vote on fundamental corporate decisions, and voting rights should be proportionate to cash flow rights. Any unequal voting rights should be time-limited and aligned with cash flow rights over time. Global Voting Guidelines Multiple share classes Against For
6 Disclosure of Voting Results Based on Class of Shares Vote rationale: All shareholders should have the right to vote on fundamental corporate decisions, and voting rights should be proportionate to cash flow rights. Any unequal voting rights should be time-limited and aligned with cash flow rights over time. Global Voting Guidelines Multiple share classes Against For
7 Issue Report Assessing Company's Human Rights Due Diligence Processes Vote rationale: The board should account for material sustainability risks facing the company, and the broader environmental and social consequences of its operations and products. Sustainability disclosures should be aligned with applicable global reporting standards and frameworks to support investors in their analysis of risks and opportunities. Where a company’s disclosure does not meet our needs as a financial investor, we will consider supporting a well-founded shareholder proposal calling for reasonable disclosure. We will not support a shareholder proposal that appears to impose a strategy or prescribe detailed methods, unrealistic timeframes or targets for implementation. Global Voting Guidelines Corporate sustainability reporting Against For
8 Issue Report Addressing Antisemitism and Hate in Online Platforms Vote rationale: The board should account for material sustainability risks facing the company, and the broader environmental and social consequences of its operations and products. Sustainability disclosures should be aligned with applicable global reporting standards and frameworks to support investors in their analysis of risks and opportunities. Where a company’s disclosure does not meet our needs as a financial investor, we will consider supporting a well-founded shareholder proposal calling for reasonable disclosure. We will not support a shareholder proposal that appears to impose a strategy or prescribe detailed methods, unrealistic timeframes or targets for implementation. Global Voting Guidelines Corporate sustainability reporting Against For
9 Report on Impact of Data Center Expansions on Climate Commitments Vote rationale: We will not support a shareholder proposal where the company does not appear to have significant gaps in their management or reporting of the relevant sustainability risk. We assess companies against our public expectations on environmental and social issues. We may consider direction of travel and pace of change as part of our assessments. Global Voting Guidelines Shareholder proposals on sustainability Against Against
10 Report on Integrating Child Safety Improvement Metrics into Executive Compensation Program Against Against
11 Oversee and Report on Data Protection Impact Assessment on Generative AI Chatbots Vote rationale: The board should account for material sustainability risks facing the company, and the broader environmental and social consequences of its operations and products. Sustainability disclosures should be aligned with applicable global reporting standards and frameworks to support investors in their analysis of risks and opportunities. Where a company’s disclosure does not meet our needs as a financial investor, we will consider supporting a well-founded shareholder proposal calling for reasonable disclosure. We will not support a shareholder proposal that appears to impose a strategy or prescribe detailed methods, unrealistic timeframes or targets for implementation. Global Voting Guidelines Corporate sustainability reporting Against For
12 Report on Risks of Anti-American Discrimination from H-1B Visa Program Use Vote rationale: We will not support a shareholder proposal where the company does not appear to have significant gaps in their management or reporting of the relevant sustainability risk. We assess companies against our public expectations on environmental and social issues. We may consider direction of travel and pace of change as part of our assessments. Global Voting Guidelines Shareholder proposals on sustainability Against Against

Disclaimer

This page contains certain information as to the voting intentions of Norges Bank in its role as manager of the Government Pension Fund Global. This disclosure is provided to promote transparency as to Norges Bank’s engagement with investee companies, and in view of its approach to responsible investing. Norges Bank’s voting intention is an internal decision and has not been agreed with any third party. Please note the following:

  • This disclosure is provided for information purposes only. It does not constitute advice and should not be taken as a recommendation or an instruction on any matter, including whether any relevant third party should buy, sell or retain shares, or how any third party should exercise any voting rights they may have. Any person who wishes to obtain advice should seek this from a professional adviser. This disclosure is not a proxy solicitation and is not intended to influence the vote of other shareholders.
  • No reliance should be placed on this information or its accuracy, and Norges Bank accepts no responsibility or liability for any action taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Any relevant third party should form their own views based on their own analysis of the relevant facts and circumstances.
  • To be clear, Norges Bank has no duty of care in respect of any third party who decides to view this disclosure, which shall be done entirely at their own risk.
  • Any information in this disclosure is subject to change without notice. In particular, be aware that Norges Bank’s intentions and the holdings of the Government Pension Fund Global may change over time and, to the extent permitted by applicable law, Norges Bank disclaims any responsibility to update this information as a result of such changes or for any other reason.
  • Securities lending or other activity may mean that the votes cast by Norges Bank are significantly different than its economic or published holding of shares, or significantly different from its holding at the date of this disclosure. No assumption should be made or reliance placed on the number of votes that will be cast.
  • Norges Bank is not subject to any prohibition on securities lending, trading or other activity as a result of this disclosure at any point prior to or after the publication of this disclosure.
Go back to search page